Compare digital provider proposals
Scope, exclusions, evidence, recurring costs and exit: compare provider proposals using shared assumptions.
Read the practical method →Ten points for defining website goals, content, constraints, budget, acceptance and maintenance.
Resource identity and purpose checked against the source on . This check does not verify all service conditions or individual data records.
Use the guide to describe outcomes, audiences, content, constraints and criteria for comparing proposals.
Prepare a usable brief from needs, audiences and content. Add a principal task and its limits; compare proposals against that scope rather than a list of technologies.
A template must be adapted to the project. It does not replace discussion of constraints and dependencies.
Audience and expected outcome.
Content, responsibilities and exclusions.
Acceptance criteria understood by candidates.
Scope, exclusions, evidence, recurring costs and exit: compare provider proposals using shared assumptions.
Read the practical method →France Num · Cahier des charges web — primary source. Link checked . The checklist is editorial guidance; link availability does not guarantee completeness or suitability.
Read the editorial method · Report a correction with its source