Compare digital provider proposals
Scope, exclusions, evidence, recurring costs and exit: compare provider proposals using shared assumptions.
Read the practical method →Guidance on website cost components, including hosting, licences, content and maintenance.
Resource identity and purpose checked against the source on . This check does not verify all service conditions or individual data records.
Build a list of cost components before comparing website proposals.
Use cost items to request comparable proposals. Separate creation, content, recurring costs, maintenance and exit; mark missing amounts unknown and use the comparator for your own assumptions.
Price examples are not a quote for your project or a guaranteed market price.
Exact scope covered by the price.
Recurring charges and work left to the team.
Proposal date, assumptions and exclusions.
Scope, exclusions, evidence, recurring costs and exit: compare provider proposals using shared assumptions.
Read the practical method →France Num · Coût d’un site web — primary source. Link checked . The checklist is editorial guidance; link availability does not guarantee completeness or suitability.
Read the editorial method · Report a correction with its source