Resource factsheet

Government Digital Service · Cloud lock-in

Government Digital Service guidance for examining technical dependencies, cloud service value and exit preparedness. UK public procurement requirements are not French obligations.

Resource identity and purpose checked against the source on . This check does not verify all service conditions or individual data records.

Use this resource for a specific task.

IT, cybersecurity and cloud · UK · technical method

Open the original resource

How to start

Separate the value delivered by the service from the effort of changing providers. List dependencies, then test a small export and recovery in an authorised environment.

Limits to keep in mind

This UK reference concerns cloud management. Its technical reasoning can inform selection; its institutional requirements are not transposed to French law. An exported file does not prove successful recovery.

Check before using

Three points to record with the decision.

  1. 01

    Data, relationships and functionality needed for recovery.

  2. 02

    Documented skills, costs and switching times.

  3. 03

    Distinction between technical guidance and UK public procurement requirements.

An illustrative application

Fictional example: two solutions support the same task but export different data. The team tests limited recovery and documents what must be recreated before comparing cost and dependency.

A method and complementary resources.

Test digital solution portability before committing

Check exports, dependencies, access and recovery in another solution with a documented trial and decision worksheet.

Read the practical method →

GOV.UK Service Manual · Design

Service-design methods covering user research, structure, prototypes, interface writing and simple journeys.

Explore this resource →

Source and verification

Government Digital Service · Cloud lock-in — primary source. Link checked . The checklist is editorial guidance; link availability does not guarantee completeness or suitability.

Read the editorial method · Report a correction with its source